So Close To What vs CAN Partners
Game recap
CAN Partners edged So Close To What 51-46 in a close finish. There is no quarter-by-quarter log here, so the cleanest way to identify the separation is at the shot level: both teams made 22 field goals, but CAN Partners got there in only 51 attempts, while So Close To What used 63. CAN Partners also had the perimeter advantage, knocking down 4-of-13 threes, 30.8%, compared with 1-of-15, 6.7%, for So Close. That efficiency, not extra shot volume, was the winning edge.
So Close did find ways to compete. The club shot 21-of-48 from inside the arc, 43.8%, compared with CAN Partners at 18-of-38, 47.4%, and controlled the boards 38-34, including a 15-8 edge in offensive rebounds. CAN Partners still won the steal count 10-9 and made six free throws to So Close’s one. In a game decided by five points, those margins show how a team can win despite giving up the rebounding edge.
Stat-wise, Terry Wang led the listed scorers with 23 points, 10 rebounds and 2 assists on 10-of-22 shooting. #11 added 19 points, 6 rebounds and 3 steals on 8-of-15. So Close’s #4 answered with 18 points and 5 rebounds on 9-of-13, the sharpest single shooting line in the box score. manraj singh contributed 8 points and a team-high 12 rebounds on 4-of-7, while #8 grabbed 10 boards and added 4 assists, but connected on only 2-of-17, including 1-of-6 from three.
Team takeaways
- Positive 1 - Two-point efficiencyThe team shot 21-of-48 from two-point range (43.8%), with #4 going 9-of-13 for 18 points and three steals. Build on this by creating paint touches through his cuts, off-ball screens, and reads from manraj singh. Positive 2 - Rebounding: The team won the rebounding battle 38-34 and collected 15 offensive rebounds, led by manraj singh with five and Kevin Song (#34) with four. Continue emphasizing offensive crashing and putback positioning while maintaining transition balance. Positive 3 - Defensive pressure: Nine steals and only seven team fouls helped hold CAN Partners to 43.1% shooting. Continue applying controlled ball pressure, communicating switches, and finishing closeouts with active hands rather than unnecessary contact.
- Area 1 - Perimeter shot qualityThe team made only 1-of-15 three-point attempts (6.7%), while #8 was 2-of-17 overall. Reduce early-clock, contested three-point attempts and emphasize cuts, drives, and relocation that can produce either a finish at the rim or an open kick-out. Area 2 - Ball security and creation: Thirteen turnovers against 12 assists produced a 0.92 assist-to-turnover ratio. Simplify late-clock actions, reduce unnecessary dribbles, and establish a primary ball handler and secondary creators to improve execution without increasing tempo risk. Area 3 - Rim protection: The team recorded no blocks against 51 opponent attempts. Test whether stronger weak-side rim coverage would deter drives while preserving the perimeter pressure that generated nine steals; assign a designated blocker and rehearse closeout-recovery rotations.
The foundation is strong in two-point scoring, rebounding, and pressure defense. The clearest gains should come from cleaner perimeter shot selection, improved possession management, and tested rim protection.
- Positive 1 - Efficient shootingCAN Partners shot 22-of-51 overall (43.1%), 18-of-38 from two-point range (47.4%), and 4-of-13 from three (30.8%). #11's 7-of-12 two-point shooting supports an offense that can attack efficiently while still keeping the floor spaced. Positive 2 - Top-end scoring: Terry Wang produced 23 points on 10-of-22 with 10 rebounds, while #11 added 19 points on 8-of-15. Their complementary inside scoring and perimeter threat gave the team dependable options; use screening and cutting actions around them to create third-man reads. Positive 3 - Disciplined defensive disruption: Ten steals and only one recorded team foul helped hold So Close To What to 34.9% shooting. Continue emphasizing active hands, timely closeouts, and disciplined coverage without sacrificing ball pressure.
- Area 1 - Free-throw executionThe team went 6-of-12 (50%) from the line, leaving six points available in a game decided by eight. Review the shooting routine, approach, and release under pressure, and rotate in the most reliable foul shooters during high-leverage late-game situations. Area 2 - Turnover and assist management: Fifteen turnovers against 11 assists produced a 0.73 assist-to-turnover ratio. #11 committed four turnovers and #30 committed three, so simplify reads, avoid live-ball turnovers, and develop a clearly designated secondary initiator rather than overloading the primary creators. Area 3 - Rebounding: CAN Partners was outrebounded 38-34 and held only eight offensive rebounds while the opponent collected 15. Tighten box-out assignments, communicate cutters, and use a gang-rebounding scheme while selectively sending only designated players to the offensive glass.
The win was built on efficient shooting and disruptive defense. Improved free-throw execution, cleaner ball security, and stronger rebounding should make the team's offense more sustainable and reduce performance variance.
Team stats
Box score
So Close To What
46L| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4Player #4Is this you? Claim it →Smooth operator | 18 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 9Kevin Song | 9 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-12 | 0-3 | 1-2 |
| 77manraj singh | 8 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 8Player #8Is this you? Claim it → | 5 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-17 | 1-6 | 0-0 |
| 14scott downing | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2Player #2Is this you? Claim it → | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 999Player #999 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 95Player #95Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 46 | 38 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 22-63 | 1-15 | 1-2 |
| Shooting | 34.9% | 6.7% | 50.0% | |||||||
CAN Partners
51W| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4Terry WangPlayer of the gameDouble-double | 23 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10-22 | 2-5 | 1-2 |
| 11Player #11Is this you? Claim it →Thief | 19 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8-15 | 1-3 | 2-3 |
| 30Player #30Is this you? Claim it → | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 2-5 |
| 3Player #3Is this you? Claim it →Dimer | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 18Player #18Is this you? Claim it → | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 1Player #1Is this you? Claim it → | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 999Player #999 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 54 | 34 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 22-51 | 4-13 | 6-12 |
| Shooting | 43.1% | 30.8% | 50.0% | |||||||
Played in this game? Claim your stats
Stats are tracked by jersey number. Claim your number in the free SportsVisio app and your name shows up here the next day, with every game and highlight saved to your own player profile.
- 1Get the SportsVisio app and sign up as a Player.
- 2Search TCBL, open your team and pick your league day.
- 3Tap your jersey number and claim it.
- Played on more than one team, or your team shows up twice? Claim your number on each one.
Player stats are tracked by AI from the game video. The final score comes from the league's official result.