NDD vs Mark & Arthur
Game recap
Mark and Arthur grinded out a 38-30 win over NDD, a possession-by-possession game decided by efficiency and hustle. NDD launched 62 shots but only connected on 13, while Mark and Arthur needed just 42 attempts to get their 14 makes. The glass told the story: Mark and Arthur owned a 41-29 rebounding edge, including a massive 35 defensive boards that kept NDD's offense stuck on repeat looks. NDD actually protected the ball better (5 turnovers to 15), but the shotmaking gap was just too steep to overcome. #34 paced Mark and Arthur with 16 points on 5-of-10 from the floor, all from two-point range, plus 6-of-10 from the line to go with 7 boards and 3 assists. #13 added 8 points, 8 rebounds, 3 steals, and the team's only block. On the NDD side, #5 carried the load with 17 points, burying 3 triples on his way to 7-of-17 shooting. #1 chipped in 5, but NDD got almost nothing from #15 (4 points on 2-of-13) or #7 (2 points on 1-of-10) as the offense sputtered.
Mark and Arthur shot 33% overall to NDD's 21%, and the two-point disparity was even more punishing: 44% from two (11-of-25) versus just 19% (9-of-47) for NDD. NDD actually hit a higher rate from deep (27% to 18%), but the volume of missed twos buried them. Mark and Arthur also got to the line 15 times and converted 7; NDD had just 3 free throw attempts and missed all of them. The defensive rebounding gap, 35 to 21, meant second-chance points were one-sided, and NDD's 11 fouls to Mark and Arthur's 6 compounded the disadvantage.
Team takeaways
- Three positives to build onFirst, ball movement was a strength with 9 assists on 13 made baskets - a far better assist-to-FGM ratio than the opponent and shows the offensive philosophy is sound. Second, ball security was strong with only 5 turnovers, well under what we gave up, indicating good decision-making in the half court. Third, #5 delivered a quality offensive performance with 17 points on 7 of 17 shooting and contributed 6 rebounds, showing they can be a primary scoring option. The 5 steals as a team also indicated active hands and defensive engagement throughout the rotation.
- Three areas requiring urgent correctionFirst, shooting efficiency was simply unacceptable at 21 percent overall and a brutal 19 percent on two-point attempts (9 of 47). That is not a small-sample issue - 62 total field goal attempts with that conversion rate tells me we are settling for contested, low-percentage looks. We need to prioritize the paint, drive into contact, and kick to open shooters rather than launching contested mid-range jumpers or contested twos. Second, free throw disparity was decisive - we shot 0 of 3 from the line while the opponent went 7 of 15. Not attacking the rim aggressively enough cost us easy points and put the opponent in the bonus. Third, foul trouble was damaging with 11 team fouls and #13 picking up 5 personal fouls. Several players including #15 (2 of 13) and #7 (1 of 10) struggled badly from the field - we need to set better screens to free them or adjust the playbook to put them in more advantageous positions. Bottom line: the offensive system needs a reset. Better shot selection, more aggression at the rim, and disciplined defensive rotations will be the focus heading into the next game.
- Three positives worth recognizingFirst, the glass work was exemplary - 41 total rebounds including a dominant 35 defensive boards, which limited second-chance opportunities and fueled transition. #1 and #3 combined for 22 rebounds and provided a strong interior anchor. Second, shot selection discipline on two-point looks at 44 percent (11 of 25) showed efficient interior execution, and getting to the line 15 times demonstrated aggressive downhill penetration. Third, #34 delivered an impactful 16-point performance on 50 percent shooting and added 7 rebounds, providing reliable scoring in the half court. Defensively, #13 was a disruptor with 3 steals and a block, setting the tone on that end of the floor.
- Three areas demanding attentionFirst, ball security was a major issue with 15 turnovers, and it was concentrated - #34 had 6 and #3 had 5. We need to clean up decision-making in the half court and protect the ball in traffic. Second, three-point efficiency at 3 of 17 (17.6 percent) was a weakness. Either we need to commit to higher percentage catch-and-shoot looks or drive-and-kick actions that generate cleaner shots rather than contested early-clock threes. Third, only 5 assists on 14 made baskets indicates the offense was too isolation-heavy. We have to trust the pass and move the ball to break down the defense, especially when #34 draws extra attention. Additionally, #7 needs to be more efficient - 3 of 13 from the field is below their standard, and we should review shot quality in film. Bottom line: the win was earned through rebounding and effort, but the turnovers and lack of ball movement are unsustainable against tougher opposition.
Team stats
Box score
NDD
30L| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5Daniel Yung | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-17 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 1Player #1Is this you? Claim it → | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-14 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| 15kevin wong | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-13 | 0-5 | 0-0 |
| 7Player #7Is this you? Claim it → | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6Player #6Is this you? Claim it → | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 13Player #13Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 88Player #88Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 3Player #3Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 30 | 29 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 13-62 | 4-15 | 0-3 |
| Shooting | 21.0% | 26.7% | 0.0% | |||||||
Mark & Arthur
38W| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34Player #34Is this you? Claim it → | 16 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 6-10 |
| 7Player #7Is this you? Claim it → | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-13 | 2-9 | 1-3 |
| 13Player #13Is this you? Claim it →Player of the gameThief | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 3Player #3Is this you? Claim it → | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 1Player #1Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 |
| Team totals | 38 | 41 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 14-42 | 3-17 | 7-15 |
| Shooting | 33.3% | 17.6% | 46.7% | |||||||
Played in this game? Claim your stats
Stats are tracked by jersey number. Claim your number in the free SportsVisio app and your name shows up here the next day, with every game and highlight saved to your own player profile.
- 1Get the SportsVisio app and sign up as a Player.
- 2Search TCBL, open your team and pick your league day.
- 3Tap your jersey number and claim it.
- Played on more than one team, or your team shows up twice? Claim your number on each one.
Player stats are tracked by AI from the game video. The final score comes from the league's official result.