Tate Mcrae Academy vs Niubility
Game recap
Niubility rolled to a 70-20 blowout of Tate Mcrae Academy, a wire-to-wire beatdown that pushed the margin to 50 by the final horn. From the opening tip, Niubility attacked downhill, owned the paint, and never let Tate Mcrae breathe. The rebounding gap set the tone: Niubility crashed the glass for 41 boards to just 20 for Tate Mcrae, with #02 cleaning up a game-high 12 rebounds.
The shooting disparity was stark. Niubility connected at 41% from the floor (21-of-51), bruising the paint for 18-of-38 (47%) and burying three triples from beyond the arc. Tate Mcrae, meanwhile, limped to 18% shooting (8-of-44), went just 1-of-11 from distance, and missed 26 of their 33 two-point tries. Kevin Song tried to carry the load with 10 points on 4-of-16, but got almost no help. saiyam bhatt went 0-of-7 from the field, and the offense coughed up 5 turnovers with only 7 assists on a forgettable night.
For Niubility, #14 was an absolute problem in the paint, slashing his way to 26 points on 11-of-16 with 10 rebounds. #30 chipped in 9 on 4-of-6, and #09 added 6 points with 4 assists running the show. Niubility moves to 2-1, while Tate Mcrae drops to 0-3 on the season.
Team takeaways
- Coaching Staff, there are a few bright spots worth building on. The team showed discipline with only 5 turnovers despite heavy offensive pressure, indicating sound decision-making fundamentals. Defensive rebounding was solid at 16 defensive boards, showing the players are boxing out and securing possession. Free throw efficiency at 50% was decent for the limited attempts, and Kevin Song provided a scoring anchor with 10 points, demonstrating he can be a reliable option in the half-court set.
- The boxscore reveals significant concerns we must address immediately. Shooting efficiency was critically low at 18.2% from the field and a dismal 9.1% from three-point range, suggesting our shot selection and offensive execution need serious recalibration. The team produced zero steals and zero blocks, indicating a lack of defensive intensity and disruption that allowed the opponent to shoot 41.2%. Offensive output was anemic at just 20 points total, with heavy reliance on Kevin Song who accounted for 50% of scoring. Our second-chance opportunities were minimal with only 4 offensive rebounds, and we need to develop a more balanced offensive attack rather than depending on one player to carry the load.
- Coaching Staff, the team delivered a strong, dominant performance worthy of recognition. Inside scoring was exceptional at 47.4% on two-point attempts, showing our post players and interior finishers executed the game plan beautifully. #14 was outstanding with 26 points on 11-of-16 shooting, providing a reliable scoring engine. Rebounding was commanding with 41 total boards including 11 on the offensive glass, giving us valuable second-chance opportunities. Ball movement was effective with 12 assists, and we converted free throws at a strong 83.3% rate.
- Despite the win, there are areas we cannot overlook moving forward. Our three-point shooting was inconsistent at 23.1%, and we must develop more reliable perimeter threats to prevent defenses from collapsing on our interior game. #0 went 0-for-5 with zero points and zero assists, indicating we need better shot selection or rotation decisions when that matchup is on the floor. Turnovers at 7 were manageable but preventable when called up, and our lack of steals at 0 reveals we are not applying enough ball-hawking intensity. Defensively, only one block all contest means we need more vertical disruption to challenge opponents at the rim.
Team stats
Box score
Tate Mcrae Academy
20L| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9Kevin Song | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-16 | 0-2 | 2-2 |
| 18Player #18Is this you? Claim it → | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 0Player #0Is this you? Claim it → | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| 14scott downing | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 10Player #10Is this you? Claim it → | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 67saiyam bhatt | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 20 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8-44 | 1-11 | 3-6 |
| Shooting | 18.2% | 9.1% | 50.0% | |||||||
Niubility
70W| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14Raymond HaoPlayer of the gameDouble-doubleSmooth operator | 26 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11-16 | 1-1 | 3-4 |
| 30shuang wu | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 09Jeffrey WuDimer | 6 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 3Leo Wang | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 2-2 |
| 47brian xu | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 6Hart | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 02Zheyi Bei | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 0Chang | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 50 | 41 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 21-51 | 3-13 | 5-6 |
| Shooting | 41.2% | 23.1% | 83.3% | |||||||
Played in this game? Claim your stats
Stats are tracked by jersey number. Claim your number in the free SportsVisio app and your name shows up here the next day, with every game and highlight saved to your own player profile.
- 1Get the SportsVisio app and sign up as a Player.
- 2Search TCBL, open your team and pick your league day.
- 3Tap your jersey number and claim it.
- Played on more than one team, or your team shows up twice? Claim your number on each one.
Player stats are tracked by AI from the game video. The final score comes from the league's official result.