2011 Bobcats vs CAGE
Game recap
A grind-it-out, two-point nail-biter that came down to the final possession. The 2011 Bobcats escaped with a 39-37 win over CAGE, leaning on a massive rebounding edge rather than a hot shooting touch to push their record to 2-1 and drop CAGE to 0-3 on the season.
CAGE seized the lead after halftime and controlled the pace, but the Bobcats answered with a relentless crash of the offensive glass. They ripped off second chances all night long, pulling down 19 offensive boards to CAGE's 9, and turned those extra possessions into the margin of victory. The Bobcats finished plus-15 on total rebounds, 47-32, with the interior duo of #8 (11 points, 16 rebounds) and #69 (4 points, 11 boards) dominating the glass on both ends. CAGE had no answer for that second-chance barrage down the stretch, and their late attempts couldn't find the net.
Both teams struggled from the floor in the half-court. The Bobcats shot just 16-of-62 (26%), including 6-of-26 from three and a rough 1-of-7 from the line. CAGE was a tick better, connecting at 13-of-50 (26%) and 6-of-22 from downtown, but they couldn't pull away because the Bobcats kept getting extra looks. CAGE moved the ball more crisply, 8 assists to 4, but it wasn't enough to overcome the possession battle.
Top scorers for the Bobcats: #30 poured in 16 points on 6-of-21 shooting with 3 steals, while #0 on CAGE matched the team's high with 9 points on 3-of-10, including three triples, and #10 added 9 points on 4-of-10. When the final horn sounded, the Bobcats had survived the cold shooting night by simply outworking CAGE on every loose ball and rebound that mattered.
Team takeaways
- Three positives worth building on. First, the team dominated the glass with 47 total rebounds including 19 offensive boards, which gave us valuable second-chance opportunities and showed excellent effort and positioning from our bigs, especially player 8 with 16 rebounds and player 69 with 11. Second, our defensive activity in the passing lanes was a clear strength, generating 6 steals, with player 30 contributing 3 of those and adding disruptive pressure on ball handlers throughout the game. Third, we saw balanced scoring contributions across the roster, led by player 30 with 16 points, player 8 with 11, and player 99 and #0 both adding secondary scoring, which shows we are not overly reliant on a single option and can attack from multiple positions on the floor.
- Three areas that need immediate attention. First, our overall shooting efficiency was a major concern at only 25.8 percent from the field and 23.1 percent from three-point range, meaning we are taking contested or low-quality shots; we need to run more set plays that generate cleaner looks and emphasize shot selection in practice. Second, our ball movement was nearly nonexistent with only 4 assists as a team on 16 made field goals, which is a clear sign of isolation basketball; we need to increase off-ball screens, dribble handoffs, and perimeter passing to find the open man and create higher-percentage opportunities. Third, our free throw shooting was unacceptable at 1 for 7, just 14.3 percent, and this cannot happen in close games; we need to dedicate specific practice time to free throw fundamentals and add pressure situations in shootarounds so players build confidence and rhythm at the line. Additionally, the complete absence of blocks suggests our interior protection and help-side defense need work.
- Three positives to build on. First, our ball movement was noticeably better than the opponent with 8 assists, including 3 from #24, showing we are moving the ball and trusting each other on offense, which creates better rhythm and open looks. Second, our free throw shooting was a significant strength at 5 for 12, over 41 percent, and we need to keep emphasizing trips to the line as part of our offensive identity going forward. Third, our 3-point shooting at 27.3 percent was solid and shows we have capable perimeter shooters who can stretch the floor, with players like #0 and #10 contributing effectively from outside. We also committed fewer fouls than the opponent, which kept us out of bonus situations early and gave us more defensive flexibility.
- Three areas for improvement. First, we were out-rebounded by 15 total and gave up 19 offensive rebounds, which is a major issue because those extra possessions directly led to opponent scoring chances; our bigs need to establish better box-out fundamentals and our guards must crash the glass harder to help secure defensive stops. Second, our lack of steals at only 3 for the game indicates we are not applying enough defensive pressure or getting into passing lanes, so we need to emphasize active hands, full-court traps in specific situations, and tighter on-ball defense to force more turnovers and create transition opportunities. Third, despite better ball movement, we still only scored 37 points on 50 field goal attempts, a 26 percent clip, meaning even our good offensive possessions are not being finished efficiently; we need to work on shot selection, finishing at the rim through contact, and running more designed actions to get higher-percentage looks rather than settling for contested mid-range jumpers. The absence of blocks also tells me we need better rim protection and verticality from our interior defenders.
Team stats
Box score
2011 Bobcats
39W| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30Player #30Is this you? Claim it →Thief | 16 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-21 | 3-11 | 1-5 |
| 8Player #8Is this you? Claim it →Player of the gameDouble-double | 11 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-19 | 1-8 | 0-0 |
| 99Player #99Is this you? Claim it → | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 69Player #69Is this you? Claim it → | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 67Player #67Is this you? Claim it → | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-8 | 1-6 | 0-2 |
| 999Player #999 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 77Player #77Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 11Player #11Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 39 | 47 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 16-62 | 6-26 | 1-7 |
| Shooting | 25.8% | 23.1% | 14.3% | |||||||
CAGE
37L| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | FG | 3P | FT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10Player #10Is this you? Claim it → | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 0Player #0Is this you? Claim it → | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 0-0 |
| 31Player #31Is this you? Claim it → | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 3-6 |
| 24Player #24Is this you? Claim it → | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-4 | 1-4 |
| 9Player #9Is this you? Claim it → | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| 45Player #45Is this you? Claim it → | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 6Player #6Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 7Player #7Is this you? Claim it → | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Team totals | 37 | 32 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 13-50 | 6-22 | 5-12 |
| Shooting | 26.0% | 27.3% | 41.7% | |||||||
Played in this game? Claim your stats
Stats are tracked by jersey number. Claim your number in the free SportsVisio app and your name shows up here the next day, with every game and highlight saved to your own player profile.
- 1Get the SportsVisio app and sign up as a Player.
- 2Search TCBL, open your team and pick your league day.
- 3Tap your jersey number and claim it.
- Played on more than one team, or your team shows up twice? Claim your number on each one.
Player stats are tracked by AI from the game video. The final score comes from the league's official result.